This blog post will
reflect on the topic of Theory in science and also what I have learned about
Theory after discussing it further.
This week I couldn't come to the seminar due
to another course, but after discussing the topic further with my friends I got
some new insights. Often we use the word theory in common communication, one
example could be when we tell our friends that we have a theory about
something. Most of the times these "theories" is not actual theories,
but instead they are hypothesis. The big difference is that
a hypothesis does not have to be based on facts or other theories and
does not have to be confirmed as valid by others.
When talking to my friends they told me about
Copernicus and his hypothesis. This discussion was about when does theory
become "Theory"? In the Copernicus case they came to an understanding
that even though Copernicus had data backing up his hypothesis that the earth
revolved around the sun instead of the common thought of the sun revolving
around our earth, his hypothesis did not become a theory because the
society (read church) did not accept his idea. However there seems to be no
good answer to how many people that has to confirm ones findings for it to
become a theory.
Since I missed this seminar I feel that I have a lot
of unanswered questions, but I think I have gotten a better grip around the
idea about what theory is and what it's not.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar